On 02/06/2014 11:50, Colin Watson wrote: > I don't interpret L as meaning that everything must support "all" init > systems, certainly not "alike" (indeed the text of that option is > explicit that it isn't necessarily alike). Rather, I interpret it as > saying that software-outside-init must be flexible enough to cope with > that possibility, and degrade sensibly to a lowest common subset of init > system features (IOW in practice, needs to keep working if sysvinit is > pid 1). Actual support for things beyond that minimum will require > people who care about various init systems to step up and implement it.
What does this mean in the concrete example that lead to the ctte bug? That is: Provided logind is only provided by systemd (the current situation). May GNOME depend on logind? If not, do you plan to override the GNOME maintainers with this decision? Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
