On Tue, 23 Jun 2015, Sam Hartman wrote: > I hope I've been more clear in my communication about the menu policy > bug. I'd really like to see us call for any objections to the proposal > on debian-policy and amongst ourselves prior to voting.
Right; I expect anyone who has objections to Charles or Bill's proposals to raise objections to them once our draft is announced and before we vote. I was planning on just announcing it on -ctte and -policy, but feel free to spread it wider. > My suspicion is that based on my review, we have fairly strong > evidence that the policy process did reach consensus. > > The big question seems to be whether the issue of displaying all > applications on XDG menus vs only those that are desirable in a > desktop environment was adequately considered. If we believe that it > was adequately considered and that the sense of the list is reflected > in the proposal, then I believe the policy process actually did reach > rough consensus under their process. > > If they did reach rough consensus I'd strongly prefer that we adopt > Charles proposal unless specific objections are raised during our > process. OK. So assuming this is the case, does option B in the draft now represent your view? Or is option A sufficient? -- Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com You think to yourself, hey, it's a test tube, for God's sake. Pretty soon, though, the rush from a test tube isn't enough. You want to experiment more and more. Then before you know it, you're laying in the corner of a lab somewhere with a Soxhlet apparatus in one hand, a three neck flask in the other, strung out and begging for grant money. -- Tim Mitchell, 1994 Ig Nobel Chemistry Prize Speech -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150623214537.GS2069@geta
