* Rob Weir ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 02:08:27PM -0500, Shawn McMahon wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 03:37:16PM +1100, Rob Weir said: > > > > > > Me too. gnupg 1.2.1-2, 1.4.0-5. Does evolution still have that > > > signature corruption bug? > > > > It's not evolution: > > > > [-- PGP output follows (current time: Sun 05 Jan 2003 02:07:29 PM EST) --] > > gpg: Signature made Sat 04 Jan 2003 11:37:16 PM EST using DSA key ID > > 1E73B7CD > > gpg: BAD signature from "Robert Joseph Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" > > [-- End of PGP output --] > > Crap, that's not good at all. I'm using mutt+exim and I've never had > anyone complain about bad signtaures. Do you think it's an issue on my > end or yours? > [-- PGP output follows (current time: Tue 07 Jan 2003 10:11:40 GMT) --] gpg: Signature made Tue 07 Jan 2003 06:55:04 GMT using DSA key ID 1E73B7CD gpg: Good signature from "Robert Joseph Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" gpg: checking the trustdb gpg: checking at depth 0 signed=51 ot(-/q/n/m/f/u)=0/0/0/0/0/2 gpg: checking at depth 1 signed=27 ot(-/q/n/m/f/u)=51/0/0/0/0/0 gpg: next trustdb check due at 2003-05-31 gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. Primary key fingerprint: 408A 71A2 EFA3 A17B 0D0C 569D BD0F 8385 1E73 B7CD [-- End of PGP output --]
mutt seems pretty happy with your signature; -Thom
