On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 05:01:51PM +0000, MJ Ray wrote: > Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This is suggested in debian bug #171801 and mutt bug #1406. > > See http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mutt-dev/message/16813 > > > > However, the list-post header is not a replacement for mail-followup-to. > > No, but it is a replacement for mutt's lists configuration directive, which > was what I posted in reply to. Nice trim-and-ignore of the other paragraph, > by the way!
I thought the other paragraph had been well discussed already. Anyway: > > Please cease this discussion if you're going to keep ignoring my suggestion > > that you add your request not to be cc'd to your signature as well as your > > headers. The MFT header is not generally displayed by clients and is not > > standard, so few email clients support it. I don't think adding it to a signature works. It's not the sort of thing that I personally would notice when doing a reply. It's more effective for people to just follow the debian list policy. I notice that you are using slrn and a mail to news gateway. Does your gateway convert M-F-T to news's Followup-To: ? It should. It's true that M-F-T is not standard yet, but if we agree that it conveys useful information, shouldn't we encourage its use and support? Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
