On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 12:03:34AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 04:42:44AM -0800, Alexander Hvostov wrote: > > On Sun, 2003-02-02 at 17:06, Tim van Erven wrote: > > > * Rendering delays. Waiting > 1s for each mail to render is > > > unacceptable when you have to go through a lot of mail. > > > > Configure your MUA to ignore some of the more CPU-intensive markup (eg, > > images). > > Isn't the onus on you as the proponent of HTML to sell it to the rest of > us? Specifically, what is the advantage of HTML for email? What can you > communicate with HTML that you can't with plain text?
Note that the proponent of switching email to HTML is the same guy who last week was ranting against the "non-standard, crap DJB header" that is Mail-Followup-To: Draw your own conclusions :-) -- Nathan Norman - Incanus Networking mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] There are 10 kinds of people in the world, those that can do binary arithmetic and those that can't.
