[from -devel] On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 02:03:00PM +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: > This depends on point of view. > If a library < X.Y does not provide a feature needed by a package, it's a > common practice to make package depend on library (>= X.Y). Other > packages, that don't need that library feature, don't need to depend on > library (>= X.Y). > The case with libapache-mod-php4 / glibc looks similar: glibc less than > 2.3.2.ds1-17 does not provide neede functionality [due to a bug]. This > affects libapache-mod-php4, but does no affect most (all?) other packages.
So, lacking a bug is a feature? I always thought bugs were features... --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
