On Mon, 10 May 2004 09:45:16 +0100, Wasim wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi, > > Derek Gladding wrote: > > On Sunday 09 May 2004 06:09 pm, Thomas Ritter wrote: > > > >>>Please, stop spam on l.d.o! > >> > >>Someone would have to provide some cluster or mainframe to enable > >>Spamassassin's Bayes filtering on the lists - my local spamassin > >with>Bayes got the mail. The existing calculation power is far from > >being>able to process all the mails of all the lists. > > > > > > Anyone able to give a rough, gut-feel estimate of how much > > CPU/Disc/Mem is needed to achieve this across all the debian lists ? > > I'd happily throw some $$$ or h/w into the pot towards the required > > upgrade. > > I guess it would save a lot of processing if only e-mails sent from > non-list members were processed for spam. I can't imagine that > spammers would sign up for, say, debian-user :-) > > The only thing that this policy would fall over on, would be if > spammers start forging addresses belonging to valid list-members. ..old news. New policy suggestions could be wipe all lists clean and force every "new" list member to state which ip range he posts from, and ban all wintendos. -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case.
