* Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050526 11:02]: > > >> http://www.schmehl.info/humor/pic/it/fsck-7801/4.jpg > > > ....and no errors found - a tribute to ext2(3?)! > > I don't know. I would think that the fact that ext2/3 doesn't know how > > to count would be a vote against it. > It's more likely that the system's firmware battery was drained or so, > so that the date was set to something way off base.
Yes, my pictures were "faked" that way - but they still look some kind of cool :) Yours sincerely, Alexander -- http://learn.to/quote/ http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
