Simon Paillard dijo [Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:05:57PM +0200]: > On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:25:25PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > > We have carried a major.minor scheme as a release numbering scheme > > since the Early Days, > [..] > > So, for the past years we have had x.0.y with growing `y' for point > > releases, and skiping to (x+1).0.0. And the zero in the middle carries > > no meaning anymore. > > On a related note, if we want dots, sub versions to be meaninful, using > them in the ISO name scheme as well may help. > > Many people downloaded Debian 505 recently. > > See #506489.
...At least they didn't get a 404 when trying to download Debian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-curiosa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100914213955.ga29...@gwolf.org
