I thought this was a poem before I got to the else On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Jakub Wilk <[email protected]> wrote:
> * Gianfranco Costamagna <[email protected]>, 2016-01-15, 15:55: > >> lintian is wrong in this case, so there is no need to override it. >> > > Um, no; on the contrary, Lintian being wrong is the only legitimate reason > to add an override. > > Here's how one should deal with Lintian tags: > > if my package is buggy: > if I'm being lazy: > leave the tag un-overridden, > (so that it serves as a reminder > for the future less-lazy me) > else: > fix the package > else: > add override > if Lintian could be fixed easily: > file a bug against Lintian > while Lintian is still buggy: > wait patiently > remove override > > -- > Jakub Wilk > > -- All programmers are playwrights, and all computers are lousy actors. #define sizeof(x) rand() :wq
