Le 21 avril 2016 23:23:49 GMT+02:00, Hubert Chathi <[email protected]> a écrit : >On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 20:47:34 +0000, Aigars Mahinovs ><[email protected]> said: > >> You can make a openstack-fuel-agent package and it will be clear that >> it is useless to people that do not know what openstack is. ... > >Not necessarily: "openstack-fuel-agent" (by itself) can just as easily >be understood (by someone who has no idea what OpenStack is) as "a fuel >agent named openstack", just like the "chromium-browser" package is >(was) "a browser called Chromium", or "ninja-build" is "a build system >called ninja". So someone who is looking for, say, a fuel tracker >might >not be any less confused by "openstack-fuel-agent" than by just >"fuel-agent".
"I must document system" Or "anything to do with security review" Contextual names are better. Just think of how Apache modules are named after. -- Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma brièveté.
