On Mon, 2004-10-04 at 07:32, Andreas Tille wrote: > The main problem is to increase the sensibility of maintainers to accept that > there is a certain need for preconfiguration which IMHO enhances the quality > of packages for Debian also in general. Perhaps it was a little bit short > cutted wording in my previous mails and I hope that it was not interpreted > as an invitation to NMU for everybody. The question is whether we might > gain some acceptance for an NMU if the only alternative would be a fork.
I don't think we'll get the results we desire without the teeth of policy. > (You see that a proper wording is absolutely necessary ...) Are we actively seeking any changes to policy? If not, then why not? If so, then which policies, and where are the drafts? Ben -- Ben Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
