|| On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:07:04 +0200 (CEST) || Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
at> On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> I understand it later looking at source code. What I did is
>> create a task called common because, in my case, I don't need
>> user management now nor menu system.
at> Just to make sure: Did you created a file tasks/common? I would not
at> really do this because this name has a special meaning in other contents.
at> If I were you I would choose a different name.
at> BTW, do you think I would over estimate the importance of an extra
at> user menu? IMHO this extra more user centric menu is a good help for
at> our users.
This is fine to me right now. I can move the task to base without
problems ;-)
Only one useful thing is bloke the task name common to be used.
--
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
pgpPZk8H5Mu3o.pgp
Description: PGP signature
