On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 14:22 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > While Debian-Jr decided to set the focus on DebTags I think having > something that supports metapackages is still important. IMHO > DebTags might have great advantages over metapackages I think we > should do this *in adition* and not as a replacement. Thus having > stable methods to build metapackages is important, IMHO.
Debtags only addresses a fraction of the needs of CDDs. I'd be interested in seeing CDDT take debtags into account alongside metapackages. Ben -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
