Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 01:34:35PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>
>> So now, the real problem, is to get APT supporting what you need
>> (update.d hooks) and then all the rest is trivial to implement?
>
> Then we need also aptitude and synaptic and update-notifier to implement
> the hooks, since the update code isn't shared in the library, but copied
> and pasted from apt-get.cpp and then customized.
Looks like we need to fix this design issue then. IMHO, we might try
to figure out a common code for those applications. If all those use
the same basic information from the system they can also handle a
common base code for update process.
We might have a code to be able to handle application specific code
using polimorfism.
--
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
