On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 13:16 +0200, Free Ekanayaka wrote: > |--==> Jeroen van Wolffelaar writes: > > JvW> On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 01:42:51PM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote: > >>There! Suite is a *great* idea! > > JvW> 'suite' is also used in dak to mean 'stable', 'testing', 'unstable' > etc. > JvW> Those are 'suites'. > > JvW> Not that this means you shouldn't use 'suite', but it is a terminology > JvW> clash. > > I thought the same. What about 'task'? It would be consistent with the > way Debian has historically handled and named collections of packages > (with tasksel). Not a big deal though, I really like how things are > evolving here! Well, but things like Openoffice, KDE, Gnome, etc. (which are currently in suite:: ) are no tasks, so this would mean to introduce a new category - which is not a problem by itself. I think suite is fitting though - task is somewhat misleading. A CDD is not necessarily related to a task. For me, task would mean something like use::
Best regards Ben -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
