Hi Anthony!

You wrote:

> Looks like we've gotten to the point where we get so much spam that 
> spamscan can't cope with it as fast as it's coming in. I think we need 
> to start doing stuff about that; but that implies changing the way the 
> BTS behaves; eg, not accepting mail that's not authenticated in some 
> way, and not showing the full contents of bug reports to web browsers 
> that aren't authenticated in some way.

Could you give an indication of how much spam/ham is received on an
avergae day or so?
Would setting up dedicated Debian mail servers, as suggested a while
ago, be a possible solution to the problem?

-- 
Kind regards,
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Bas Zoetekouw              | GPG key: 0644fab7                     |
|----------------------------| Fingerprint: c1f5 f24c d514 3fec 8bf6 |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] |              a2b1 2bae e41f 0644 fab7 |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to