Your message dated Thu, 20 Mar 2003 15:01:14 +0000 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line multiple copies of this bug... has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Apr 2000 20:45:49 +0000 Received: (qmail 20161 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2000 20:45:49 -0000 Received: from smtp-rt-5.wanadoo.fr (HELO bassia.wanadoo.fr) (@193.252.19.159) by master.debian.org with SMTP; 16 Apr 2000 20:45:49 -0000 Received: from villosa.wanadoo.fr (193.252.19.122) by bassia.wanadoo.fr; 16 Apr 2000 22:45:47 +0200 Received: from bylbo.nowhere.earth (62.161.77.57) by villosa.wanadoo.fr; 16 Apr 2000 22:45:47 +0200 Received: from dwitch by bylbo.nowhere.earth with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 12gxnN-0002fm-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 17 Apr 2000 00:45:37 +0200 From: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 00:45:37 +0200 (CEST) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: debbugs: reassign log not accurate X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under 21.1 (patch 8) "Bryce Canyon" XEmacs Lucid User-Agent: EMIKO/1.13.9 (Euglena tripteris) FLIM/1.13.2 (Kasanui) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.1 (patch 8) (Bryce Canyon) (i386-debian-linux) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Package: debbugs Version: In use on bugs.d.o on 00-03-17 It seems the original package on which the bug was logged is not accurate: > reassign 56886 boot-floppies Bug#56886: boot problems Bug reassigned from package `boot-floppies' to `boot-floppies'. -- Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Why make M$-Bill richer & richer ? debian-email: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Support Debian GNU/Linux: | Cheaper, more Powerful, more Stable ! http://www.altern.org/ydirson/ | Check <http://www.debian.org/> --------------------------------------- Received: (at 62490-done) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Mar 2003 15:01:18 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 20 09:01:17 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from tungsten.btinternet.com [194.73.73.81] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18w1Xh-0001SD-00; Thu, 20 Mar 2003 09:01:17 -0600 Received: from host81-132-174-158.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([81.132.174.158] helo=riva.lab.dotat.at) by tungsten.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #23) id 18w1Xf-0000xE-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 20 Mar 2003 15:01:15 +0000 Received: from cjwatson by riva.lab.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) for [EMAIL PROTECTED] id 18w1Xe-0001GM-00; Thu, 20 Mar 2003 15:01:14 +0000 Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 15:01:14 +0000 From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: multiple copies of this bug... Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES,SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE, SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.44 X-Spam-Level: On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 07:08:39PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > For the record, this is the same bug as #59731 or #62319. As Josip said in the closing message for those bugs, messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED] don't get processed multiple times any more. I think that deals with this report too. Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]