On Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 02:58:48PM -0500, Drew Scott Daniels wrote: > unstable(new pkg)---> testing1---> stable1 ---> revisions1 (r1...) > | > |-> unstable ---> testing2 ---> stable2 ---> revisions2 > | > |-> unstable ---> testing3 > | > |-> unstable
That's not a complete example. Also possible is something like:
unstable (1) -> testing
|
`-> unstable (2) -> testing -> stable
| | | |
| | | `-> proposed-updates (2s1) -> stable
| | |
| | `-> (2t1) testing-proposed-updates -> testing
| |
| `-> unstable (2.1) -> testing
|
`-> unstable (3)
Where bugs are fixed in 2t1 and 2s1 that aren't fixed in 2.1, and bugs
were fixed in 2.1 that aren't fixed in 3.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``Dear Anthony Towns: [...] Congratulations --
you are now certified as a Red Hat Certified Engineer!''
pgpIPOGifY45M.pgp
Description: PGP signature
