Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2005 02:54:26 +0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line X-$gProject-PR-Package: $data->{package} obviates the need for 
subject munging
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Aug 1999 22:16:08 +0000
Received: (qmail 24132 invoked from network); 31 Aug 1999 22:16:03 -0000
Received: from mx02.uni-tuebingen.de (134.2.3.12)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 31 Aug 1999 22:16:03 -0000
Received: from borkum ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [172.16.9.8])
        by mx02.uni-tuebingen.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA02468;
        Wed, 1 Sep 1999 00:15:52 +0200
Received: by zxmjz18.extern.uni-tuebingen.de
        via sendmail from stdin
        id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Debian Smail3.2.0.102)
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 31 Aug 1999 18:50:18 +0200 (CEST) 
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: reportbug: should add the package name to the subject
X-Mailer: reportbug 0.23
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 18:50:18 +0200

Package: reportbug
Version: 0.23
Severity: wishlist

It would be nice if reportbug would add the package against which the
bug was filed in front of the bug report, so that readers of the bug
report mailing lists can easier see if a bug report is of interest to
them.

        Falk


-- System Information
Debian Release: potato
Architecture: alpha
Kernel: Linux borkum 2.2.5 #2 Mon Apr 12 09:16:55 CEST 1999 alpha

Versions of packages reportbug depends on:
ii  python-base                   1.5.2-5    An interactive object-oriented scr

-- Configuration Files:
/etc/reportbug.conf changed [not included]

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 43864-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jul 2005 00:03:55 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 15 17:03:55 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp-3.hut.fi [130.233.228.93] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1Dta9q-000665-00; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 17:03:54 -0700
Received: from localhost (katosiko.hut.fi [130.233.228.115])
        by smtp-3.hut.fi (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j6G03Nwu025397
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 03:03:23 +0300
Received: from smtp-3.hut.fi ([130.233.228.93])
 by localhost (katosiko.hut.fi [130.233.228.115]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with LMTP id 06344-37-9 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
 Sat, 16 Jul 2005 03:03:23 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from xieana.donarmstrong.org (a130-233-5-237.debconf5.hut.fi 
[130.233.5.237])
        by smtp-3.hut.fi (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id j6FNsbfY024732
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 02:54:37 +0300
Received: (nullmailer pid 4079 invoked by uid 1000);
        Fri, 15 Jul 2005 23:54:26 -0000
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 02:54:26 +0300
From: Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: X-$gProject-PR-Package: $data->{package} obviates the need for subject 
munging
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-TKK-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.1.2-hutcc at katosiko.hut.fi
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

X-$gProject-PR-Package: $data->{package} provides enough information
to separate between bug reports by package, rather than including
[$data->{package}] in the mesages sent out.

If you still want that, you can write a rather trivial script with
procmail and formail to stick the contents of X-Debbugs-PR-Package:
into the subject.


Don Armstrong

-- 
All bad precedents began as justifiable measures.
 -- Gaius Julius Caesar in "The Conspiracy of Catiline" by Sallust

http://www.donarmstrong.com              http://rzlab.ucr.edu


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to