On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 08:55:46AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Matej Vela wrote: > > It's just something I've started doing to make these bugs easier to > > ignore on <http://bugs.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > > > > > I find this rather strange ... why not simply CC the bug greports so > > > that anyone trying to fix it will discover that the package is in the > > > process of being removed ? > > > > Blocking makes the removal bug visible from the summary. If you find > > it counter-intuitive, I can use a being-removed user tag... > > I find that more logical, but I'm not sure if it's worth changing your > habit. What do other people think ? > > Maybe there should be some meta-info per package (and not only per-bug) in > the same spirit than the usertags ... this may be worth suggesting to the > debbugs developer. This is #111068 and relatives; consider this a suggestion for a "being removed" tag.
Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
