notfound 283762 5.10.6-0.CVS.20041116-2 notfixed 283762 5.10.6-0.cvs.20041116-1 thanks
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010, Tommi Vainikainen wrote: > I've recently became maintainer of package gnus, and I've been > resolving situation with some old bugs. > > However I cannot understand why web page listing still has some very old fixed > bugs not categorized as resolved and not archived. > > Please take a look at > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=gnus;dist=unstable > > For example there is bug #283762 which has following information: > > Found in version 5.10.6-0.CVS.20041116-2 > Fixed in version 5.10.6-0.cvs.20041116-1 > > Is this comparison case-sensitive, because difference in case could > explain this? Still that does not explain why fixed version has lower > case, even if last mail to -done in that bug report clearly uses upper > case in the word "CVS" inside version number. Yes, they're case sensitive, and there was a bug that they were being improperly lower-cased. You have to fix these manually using fixed and notfixed. However, in this case, the version that they were marked as fixed in is nonsensical, as it's a predecessor of the version that the bug was filed in. In such cases, you can just close the bugs without a version (or you can clear out the found and fixed information if you want.) Don Armstrong -- "What, now?" "Soon equates to good, later to worse, Uagen Zlepe, scholar. Therefore, immediacy." -- Iain M. Banks _Look to Windward_ p 213 http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
