> But there are still some open question that are worth a discussion. On > of the main concepts of g-a-i is to make enabling additional and third > party repositories as easy as possible. But do we want this in Debian? I think we should do this.
> The application data will be separated into three packages:
> app-install-data-debian-main, app-install-data-debian-contrib and
> app-install-data-non-free.
the number of .desktop files in contrib and non-free is too low
> 1. The Ubuntu way: Shipping the data for all applications of main,
> contrib and non-free by default, excluding the icons, using filters to
> select the level of freedom and defaulting to only show applications of
> main. The filters could be the following:
>
> all applications (main, contrib, non-free), only Free Debian
> applications (main), only installed applications
>
> (we don't need to promote third party applications and we do not support
> non-free applications)
This seems to be the right way.
> Finally there is still one open dependency: sexy-python. Since the ITP
> holder does not respond to mails it would be nice if anybody else could
> upload it.
I have a package at jak-linux.org, see
http://jak-linux.org/.tmp/sexy-python_0.1.9-1.dsc
--
Julian Andres Klode
IRC Nickname: juliank (Debian/OFTC + Freenode)
Fellow of FSFE: https://www.fsfe.org/en/fellows/jak (No. 1049)
Debian Wiki: http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode
Ubuntu Wiki: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/JulianAndresKlode
In Launchpad: https://launchpad.net/~juliank
Packages Overv: http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Languages: German, English, [bit French]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
