On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 3:12 AM, Yves-Alexis Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On ven, 2008-08-15 at 00:49 -0500, Dusty Wilson wrote: >> Providing something for 1680x1050 would be *highly* appreciated. > > Yeah but basically it's the same aspect ratio than 1280×800, 1440×900 > and 1920×1200, which means one can scale the background. (and so on for > 4:3 ones). So really I don't know how many different one we need to use. > (especially since most people will use svg ones)
I agree. If it's SVG, as long as the aspect ratio is available, I'm fine. But if it's something like a PNG, I'd really rather not scale it.
