I agree. Would be like better with Critical Bugs being classified by different 
things. This discernment seems good.
 Have nice days. 

    Em Quarta-feira, 6 de Abril de 2016 15:15, Thiago Zoroastro 
<[email protected]> escreveu:
 

 I agree. Would be like better with Critical Bugs being classified by different 
things. This discernment seems good.
 Have nice days.

    Em Quarta-feira, 6 de Abril de 2016 13:52, Daniel Espinosa 
<[email protected]> escreveu:
 

 Is it possible to shorten the time of Desktop oriented distribution of Debian?

While it requires an analysis of critical release bugs, may be we can add a 
classification of them by Desktop Release Critical Bugs, in order to release a 
Stable Desktop usable version of Debian.

May be this means. classify bugs in:

* Server Release Critical Bugs

* Desktop Release Critical Bugs

This could help some Debian derivative, Desktop Oriented distributions to 
release or better bug tracking.

But also, we can see more frequent Debian Desktop Stable releases!

Advice should be done, about that using it as Server, installing un-stable 
(testing or sid) packages versions are un-desired, not convenient and no 
supported by Debian.


Of course we can see a regular Stable release, using a Server brand, with all 
stable packages, while Desktop version could go ahead using more recent 
packages, but stable enough to be usable by newcomers and users.


-- 
Trabajar, la mejor arma para tu superación
"de grano en grano, se hace la arena" (R) (en trámite, pero para los cuates: 
LIBRE)

   

  

Reply via email to