Before we vote, I would like to propose a clarification of the
dual-logo licences:
> Licenses:
> official logo license:
> Copyright (c) 1999 Software in the Public Interest
> I. This logo may only be used if:
> a) the product it is used for is made using a documented procedure
> as published on www.debian.org (for example official CD-creation)
> b) if we give approval for its use
There must be an explicit "or" between a) and b), as follows:
I. This logo may only be used if EITHER:
a) the product it is used for is made using a documented procedure
as published on www.debian.org (for example official
CD-creation), OR
b) official approval is given by Software in the Public
Interest for its use for this purpose
(I've also changed the wording in (b) to make it clearer, but I don't
like what I've produced.)
Maybe the details of the wording should be discussed on debian-legal?
Julian
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian GNU/Linux Developer. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-*- Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for my PGP public key. -*-
