>> "JM" == J�r�me Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...] >> Et pour y uploader c'est simple, dans le changelog l� o� il y a marqu� >> "unstable" tu marques "woody-proposed-updates". > Oui mais �a ne me dit pas quels sont les crit�res pour l'acceptation > de mes paquets ... Les m�mes que pour les mise � jour de la potato ? C'est quand assez restrictif. ,---- | 1. The package fixes a security problem. An advisory by our own | Security Team would be quite helpful. I really should make this a | requirement for security uploads. | | 2. The package fixes a critical bug which can lead into data loss, | data corruption, or an overly broken system, or the package is | broken or not usable (anymore). | | 3. The stable version of the package is not installable at all due to | broken or unmet dependencies or broken installation scripts. | | 4. All released architectures have to be in sync. | | Packages, which I will most probably reject: | | . Package which fix non-critical bugs. | | . Misplaced uploads, i.e. packages that were uploaded to 'stable | unstable' or `frozen unstable'. | | . Packages for which its binary packages are out of sync with regard | to all supported architectures in the stable distribution. | | . Binary packages for which the source got lost somehow. `---- Christian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
