On Sun, 6 May 2001, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 11:27:13PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote: > > Is there any reason why libggi2 from unstable is not in testing? All > > architectures have now been compiled, being all present and up-to-date in > > the pool, but update-excuses gives no hints as to why it hasn't been > > accepted in testing. It (update-output) mumbles something incoherent about > > the package on alpha, but it's now been built for alpha. > > Yup, but the version on alpha depends libc6.1 >= 2.2.3-1 or so, and > libc6 2.2.3-1 doesn't build on i386...
After two build failures (because of broken gcc and fileutils) it did finally build and I did upload it to incoming. If no new problems arise and Ben doesn't upload a new version it will go into testing in four days. > Cheers, > aj cu Adrian -- Nicht weil die Dinge schwierig sind wagen wir sie nicht, sondern weil wir sie nicht wagen sind sie schwierig.