On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 08:58:57AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Why don't you "man fts_read" and implement the correct way of checking > > for errors? > > I believe the author wrote the original loop because the fts_ > functions could fail to operate as expected.
Well please check if the author's assumptions are valid, and if so, direct your attention to fixing fts_read(), everyone would benefit. The discussion of how to make that ugly loop look "nicer" is useless. -- Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards, Guus Sliepen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgpU56pFzfY5Y.pgp
Description: PGP signature
