On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 11:05:31AM +0200, Sebastian Rittau wrote: > On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 10:20:28PM -0500, Jeff Licquia wrote: > > > Given that gcc, binutils, and KDE are in main, it would seem that the > > status quo and the DFSG are in conflict, or the status quo and someone's > > interpretation of the DFSG are in conflict at least. > > As far as I can see neither the gcc nor the binutils documentation has > invariant sections. I don't know about KDE.
Take a closer look at the GCC documenation, at funding free software. -- David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED] "It's not a habit; it's cool; I feel alive. If you don't have it you're on the other side." - K's Choice (probably referring to the Internet) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]