-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 15 Apr 2002 19:25, David Odin wrote: > On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 07:17:38PM +1000, David Findlay wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Is there a particular reason why Supermount couldn't be included in the > > debian unstable kernels as an option? It works brilliantly on Mandrake, > > and makes things much easier to use. Thanks, > > Please, no! > > Supermount has a lots of problems if you're not alone on your system, > and most of its features can be done with the more robust automount.
Why can't it be included *ONLY AS AN OPTION*? automount is totally insufficient compared to the supermount patch. Or is there some other patch that has equal functionality for mounting removable media immediately when it is put in and then umounting it when ejected? Thanks, David -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8up+Sx58m2d272NoRAnE0AKCetioeGNIhCkmHjYABI2Gm1U5frACfZmeu uiDHUI/hkWJfEhC89S+FaQg= =ks9v -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]