Quoting Craig Dickson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > So, since you neglected to supply the version numbers of the faulty > packages, I am unsure whether you're referring to an upload that didn't > make it into Sid today, or to razor 1.20-1. Should we all downgrade to > razor 1.19-1, or is that one okay? (It seems to be working, but you also > didn't tell us what the bad package's symptoms are, so I can't evaluate > this with certainty either.)
Sorry, i was referring to 1.20-1 indeed.
> I'm glad you take the effort to package these things for us. I use them
> and appreciate them. But your problem report is so lacking in
> information that it's basically useless.
I only package razor, i can't take credit for spamasassin :)
Greets,
Robert
--
( o> Linux Generation <o )
///\ finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for my GnuPG/PGP key. /\\\
\V_/ \_V/
<doogie> 'How to Raise Your I.Q. by Eating Gifted Children'
pgpfXq6oS0Rx0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
