And the SUM of the numbers in the version number is also an even number!!! On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 07:52:57PM +1000, Brian May wrote: > Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 19:52:57 +1000 > From: Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: XFree 4.2.0 - again > Mail-Followup-To: Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > debian-devel@lists.debian.org > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 10:56:33AM +1000, Roger So wrote: > > Why do people like you insists on having the latest version of > > everything without making sure that it's actually _better_ than what we > > have? > > Are you implying that the latest version isn't always the best version? > > Yeah right! ;-) > > > > Rather than repeating what most others have said, I'll give you one more > > reason why not rushing 4.2.0 into woody is a good thing: the whole i18n > > architecture changed from 4.1 to 4.2, and many bugs _were_ introduced in > > the transition -- like X clients segfault on startup if Xlib can't find > > the input method specified in the environment, and so on. I for one am > > glad that Branden is not rushing things through. > > I need X 4.2 because it... errr... umph..... > > hang on a moment.... > > ...because its version number is made entirely of even numbers. > > ;-) > > (knew there had to be a good reason). > -- > Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
-- Patrick Ouellette [EMAIL PROTECTED] Amateur Radio: KB8PYM 50.200, 144.200 EN81fp ICBM: 41:38:25.476N 83:31:43.417W -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
