On 2 Sep 2002, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > Matthew> It's a very baaaaad thing, in my opinion. If (for whatever > Matthew> reason) you'd had a directory called dwww when you'd > Matthew> installed dwww, you'd have lost it all (I think - I don't > Matthew> think I've ever hit the situation personally). Not a > Matthew> preferred outcome, in my eyes. > > Well, I have always held (right or wrong) pretty much the opposite > view to yours: /var/www _is_ for Debian content, and local content > belongs in /usr/local. (thats why you don't see all that much in my > /var/www :-] )
That's a reasonable interpretation. Not what I'd go with, though. Do you have your DocumentRoot reconfigured? How do you handle having both Debian content and local content available side-by-side? -- Matthew Palmer, Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org