On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 08:05:48PM +0200, Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > David Starner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> sid=unstable - you know that, don't you? > > > We need someone to test unstable, don't we? We can not realistically > > test our distribution if the only people running it are those with many > > computers who put it on one they aren't really using. Please don't give > > our testers crap for actually testing the system in real life > > situations. > > If somebody _needs_ his computer working 100% ("I've got an essay due > in 24 hours...") and runs unstable on it imho some reminder that this > might be a bad choice is *required*.
I think it would be more useful to say that if you have an essay due in 24 hours, doing an upgrade may not be a good idea :) Daniel -- /-------------------- Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -------------------\ | "You keep on using that word. I do not think | | it means what you think it means." | | -- "The Princess Bride" | \---------------------- A duck! -- http://www.python.org ---------------------/