On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 12:59:17AM +0200, Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 05:23:52PM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 03:58:34PM +0200, Alexander Wirt <[EMAIL > > PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > > > Its interactive, I don't want to launch a GUI if I want so simple add a > > > package. Additionally it seams that aptitude is currently broken in Sid. > > > So this are two good reasons for me. > > > > apt is broken in sid now too. Isn't unstable fun? :) > > How that?
On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 06:14:47PM -0500, Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > Broken how? 0.5.5 is sitting in NEW still. On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 06:35:28PM -0500, EspeonEefi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > Did you get this from the line in the topic of #debian @ > irc.freenode.net? I jumped as well at first, but the apt that's MIA is > the bot in that channel, not the program in sid, I think. Try running apt in an up-to-date unstable. (this isn't apt's fault, of course) Daniel -- /-------------------- Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -------------------\ | "Anyway, running out of stack is similar to running out | | of tape on a turing machine. Maybe we should signal | | SIGCANNOLONGERPRETENDTOBEUNIVERSALTURINGMACHINE." | | -- Matthew Danish | \----------------- The Turtle Moves! -- http://www.lspace.org ----------------/
