* Marco d'Itri ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030622 16:35]: > On Jun 22, Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >There is no technical reason why we can't support libc5 anymore. The only > >reason that this is being discussed is that nobody has stood up to maintain > >the package. > This looks like a good enough reason to me. Sorry, but I can find no RFA/O-entry for this package. That should be done first before kicking it off. And I don't remember to read anything from the current maintainer either. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C