Your message dated Mon, 23 Jun 2003 23:39:41 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#198479: general: package coming to sarge before their
dependencies : breaks them.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jun 2003 08:36:30 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 23 03:36:29 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bretagne.rail.eu.org [80.65.225.51]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19UMoP-0007el-00; Mon, 23 Jun 2003 03:36:29 -0500
Received: by bretagne.rail.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 20D781666C; Mon, 23 Jun 2003 10:36:27 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Erwan David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: general: package coming to sarge before their dependencies : breaks
them.
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.12
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 10:36:27 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_18
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_18
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: general
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-06-23
Severity: normal
Tags: sarge
Several packages like html2ps or apt-file are broken in sarge because
they were put from sid before their dependencies. The coming to sarge
of a package should not be done if it makes it uninstallable.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux bretagne 2.4.20-1-k7 #1 Sat Mar 22 15:17:52 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 198479-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jun 2003 13:40:13 +0000
>From aj@azure.humbug.org.au Mon Jun 23 08:39:48 2003
Return-path: <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
Received: from azure.humbug.org.au [203.143.238.84]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19URXv-0008Aq-00; Mon, 23 Jun 2003 08:39:47 -0500
Received: from aj by azure.humbug.org.au with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 19URXp-0003sx-00; Mon, 23 Jun 2003 23:39:41 +1000
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 23:39:41 +1000
To: Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Erwan David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#198479: general: package coming to sarge before their
dependencies : breaks them.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Organisation: Lacking
X-PGP: http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/aj_key.asc
X-No-CC: Don't Cc me to mailing list posts unless you really have to
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-26.1 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,
QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_18
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_18
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
--1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 02:57:25PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> I think it is wrong to have packages with broken dependencies in
> testing,=20
If *you* think it's wrong, the thing *you* can do about it is fix the bugs
that are preventing the updated version being included.
Cheers,
aj
--=20
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``Is this some kind of psych test?
Am I getting paid for this?''
--1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iQCVAwUBPvcDHeRRvX9xctrtAQGkdAP9GhC4C+C4XYk1E3Baz1Yu+/w/w0Wbw/7K
pprD4rq/7uyofUdWsxXihIPZ51OQckNexv9Og8sZPhO6vVzOkdtT5ckcjxeyF9YE
uSY12rYVgPtexOyC791uB1ar3OUcSlueflydyZpjHpecSGBcKUUpYAWOD+1b7dKZ
iXaQ/i4TCXM=
=E44z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7--
