On 2003-07-01T07:49:20+0000 (Tuesday), Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Tobias Wolter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 2003-06-29T12:40:56+0000 (Sunday), Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: > >> Yes, NMUing essential packages without bothering to contact the > >> maintainer is cooperation at work. NOT. > > Between pissing off a maintainer and leaving a not-so-insignificant > > part of Debian quite utterly broken, I'd go for the former.
> We're talking about unstable here. We're also taking about automated package builders who've been broke here. > Read the developers reference, > http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html > paragraph 5.11.3, under > Uploading bug fixes to unstable by non-maintainers should ^^^^^^ > only be done by following this protocol: > .... > Now, did the NMU follow the rules in the developers reference ? No. From my point of view, it's an acceptable step out of bounds. I still haven't seen any bugfix from you. How about you go stop ranting about being treated unfair and DOING YOUR WORK? -towo -- We're Germans and we use Unix. That's a combination of two demographic groups known to have no sense of humour whatsoever. - Hanno Mueller in de.comp.os.unix.programming
pgpoX1f7cicyX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
