On Sun, Jul 06, 2003 at 02:07:14PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > b) people at debian-legal do not keep people at debian-doc up-to-date to > > latest consensus wrt to documentation licensing (yes, until somebody who is > > at -doc says "please RTFM" and somebody at -legal says "TFM is worthless") > > Perhaps debian-legal needs its own document, to which the DDP document > can merely refer.
Fine by me. I don't like too much digging into debian-legal :-) It would be very nice to have a document in the DDP detailing which licenses have been analised by the debian-legal mailing list and what the results have been (DFSG-free or otherwise). Regards Javi
pgpA02IqnJNSY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
