On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 03:52:38PM -0400, David Z Maze wrote: > "Jamin W. Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 08:25:16PM +0200, Robert Lemmen wrote: > >> me too! any package that doesn't build on m68k or arm is broken and > >> needs to be fixed, even if it works on x86 by chance! > > > > So, are you volunteering to help those of us without access to > > either of the above architectures with "bugs" found in our packages? > > But Debian has ~public machines for pretty much every architecture. > I'd say "look on http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi";, except that's > down; I can at least point you at section 4.4 of the Developer's > Reference, though that doesn't say a whole lot beyond this. I admit > that this doesn't necessarily help for testing installers, but for > your own packages it should be straightforward for you to do testing > and bugfixing even on architectures you don't personally own a machine > for.
Now you're assuming that I have access to the Debian machines. TMK, these machines are *not* public access machines, but instead are accessible to full DDs only. This excludes all new maintainer applicants, myself included. -- Jamin W. Collins This is the typical unix way of doing things: you string together lots of very specific tools to accomplish larger tasks. -- Vineet Kumar
