On 06 Aug 2003 16:48:18 -0500 Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Let them go. IMO it's far better to install more than is necessary, but > always get the desired functionality, than install less than is desired, > and then have to spend 20 hours recompiling for the necessary > functionality.
ExxxxCUSE me? Care to explain how this has any relevance at all? gcc-2.95 is going to somehow break without a SYMLINK to 3.3? It's going to require a RECOMPILE because a SYMLINK TO A COMPLETELY UNRELATED VERSION ISN'T PRESENT!? Do you have any idea how idiotic that sounds? "Yes, you're going to spend 20 hours recompiling for the require functionality because... well... a symlink was missing that would have forced another unrelated package to be installed." Sorry. I've spend time trying to get it to do what I want and amazingly enough, once there, I had the functionality I wanted. -- Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main connection to the switchboard of souls. | -- Lenny Nero - Strange Days -------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
pgpBbM89C1hRj.pgp
Description: PGP signature