On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 07:22:14PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 10:14:51AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > Hah, and Mark Howard wants to remove galeon 1.3 from unstable since it > > is only a cvs snapshot because of what you said. I think maybe you want > > to clarify a bit more the experimental use and cvs snapshot thingy. > > It's entirely appropriate for the maintainer to be making these decisions.
Sure, sure, if there is reason for it, but saying that : My next upload of galeon will be to the experimental branch of Debian as per the requests of the release manager. I will then request the removal of galeon packages from sarge and sid. Seems to be overkill. Also, as i understand it, uploading to experimental instead of stable only really makes sense for a package that has a somewhat stable and functional version in unstable, not to upload a package that people have been using for ages from the archive entirely to keep only the experimental version. I am sure this was not your intention as well, no ? Friendly, Sven Luther