On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 11:02:09AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote: > Also the Driscoll is very annoying by using a false email address so it can't > be replied to.
As far as I'm concerned, mail that can't be replied to *is* spam. -- Glenn Maynard
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 11:02:09AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote: > Also the Driscoll is very annoying by using a false email address so it can't > be replied to.
As far as I'm concerned, mail that can't be replied to *is* spam. -- Glenn Maynard