On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 10:26:03 -0400, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > Santiago Vila wrote: > >> Does anyone have a good estimation about the number of packages > >> which currently do this? (That is, assume *blindly* that /usr/doc > >> exists). > > > Packages that > > > a) don't use debconf ( < 5%) > > b) have not completed the transition yet (85 of 657 here) > > c) happen to be written by Manoj? :-) > > Say what now? Do you have any concrete examples, or is this > just humour that has missed my funny bone (well, I do see the smiley, > but my chain is easily jerked when talking about flaws in my > packages)? If you know of any cases in which my packages transgress, > please file a bug.
It's clearly a joke, Manoj. I'll rephrase my question: May I consider buggy any package in current testing that assumes blindly (in its maintainers scripts) that /usr/doc exists? That we can (or not) get rid of /usr/doc for new installs of sarge depends on this.