On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 11:26:26AM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: > > * Package name : linux-experimental > > I really don't care either way, but would you consider using > kernel-linux-whatever instead?
I considered it, but it's redundant and unnecessary. I'll stick with the name choosed by upstream. > Just for consistency's sake. As > someone else said, eventually there will be a kernel-freebsd or > kernel-netbsd, and having an uniform scheme to call these things would > be nice. There's no consistency in that, since FreeBSD and NetBSD are not kernels. -- Robert Millan "[..] but the delight and pride of Aule is in the deed of making, and in the thing made, and neither in possession nor in his own mastery; wherefore he gives and hoards not, and is free from care, passing ever on to some new work." -- J.R.R.T, Ainulindale (Silmarillion)