Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 10:38:10AM -0500, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > > Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> wrote on debian-devel-announce: > > > > > I think the best way is to > > > file a RFA (which we're redefining as "Request For Assistance" instead > > > of just "Request For Adoption") report against wnpp > > [cut] > > > Third, personnel deployment. As a complement to the "Request For > > > Assistance" stuff, we're also creating a new wnpp heading, OTA for > > > "Offer To Assist". > > > > Will http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ be modified to reflect these new > > tags? (When it's official I'll modify debian-bug.el) > > It is simple to do this and I also offered to do it for another proposal > one day before the compromise. When I regain CVS access I can/will take > care of it.
Thanks! Anyone know the answer to my second question? : Does the OTA bug get filled against the package you are offering to help : with, or against wnpp? I presume against the package you are offering : to help with, but then there's no easy way to see where help is offered : overall.