-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Hello Branden,
Branden Robinson wrote: | On Sat, Oct 16, 2004 at 01:28:31PM +0200, Tomas Fasth wrote: | |> What I don't understand is why you think the umask preference |> should be applied differently depending on the type of |> interface the user choose to initiate an interactive session |> with. | | | I don't. Kindly stop putting words in my mouth, and re-read my | original mail. If you can discuss this subject without indulging | yourself in straw-man attacks like this, please follow-up with a | more reasonable message.
I have re-read your mail and I beg you for pardon. I was wrong.
| And, by the way: X-No-CC: I subscribe to this list; do not CC me | on replies.
I'm very sorry but I'm not perfect. My earlier reply did not cc: you. Could you please wait for it to happen a second time in the same thread before complaining? You seem a bit touchy about it.
I found the following when I was googling for X-No-CC:
~ From: Stepan Kasal ~ Subject: Re: Paragraph indentation suppression ~ Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 10:00:55 +0200 [...] ~ PS: I'm not sending cc to the original poster, as I'm scared by ~ this: X-No-CC: If you CC me on this list, I will feed you to ~ Branden Robinson. (It seems that Karl has already been fed.)
I couldn't but smile. "Oh no, please have mercy, don't feed me to Branden!" Poor Karl :)
| Please get an MUA that respects Mail-Copies-To:.
Thanks for the advice, but I prefer Firefox for the time being. I may try to persuade the Mozilla people to accept a patch. Can you give me a reference to a RFC-draft or something equivalent?
Live in peace, Tomas
- -- Tomas Fasth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG 0x9FE8D504
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBdBw+wYdzVZ/o1QQRAuYQAJ91qTyek/fp58fX3TSGWRUmc0oUZgCfVFyA 8iz8rKvhvF3QuEX0VL4nH/c= =cKe+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----