Christian Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, 1 Jun 1997, joost witteveen wrote: > > > Non-free it is > > No. If the author forbids distribution a changed (i.e. bug fixed) > _binary_ version, I think the package may not even go into non-free. > > What do the others think?
Before we go off half-cocked here: 1) I have e-mailed the author asking for permission to distribute a bug-fixed software 2) We are distributing various programs without source already. These programs are not fixable. (Example: xforms) I really don't think that we should make lack of modification permission to be a reason to not include in non-free (after all, isn't this what non-free is for?) -- John Goerzen | Running Debian GNU/Linux (www.debian.org) Custom Programming | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .