[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes: > On Jun 18, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 11:28:25PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: >> > Stop sending mail from dynamically-assigned IP addresses. Deal. >> Please show me how to check for "dynamically-assigned IP".
> If your ISP is a good ISP, this will be advertised (by way of DNS, > whois records or private communications). > If it is less than good then I will take an educated guess. HTH. So even if I stop sending mail from dynamically assigned addresses (a requirement you have made up for yourself anyway, of the same value as "don't send mail from hostnames with a Q in them") you still are going to block email sometimes from me? Is this another example of "no false positives" in action? How about *you* fix your systems for breaking the RFCs, rather than inventing requirements that I'm supposed to adhere to, and even if I do, *still* sometimes hosing me? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
